The Cutprice Guignol

The Ninth Year: The Haunting of Swill House

Doctor Who Recaps, Season One, Episode Six: Dalek

The Doctor: What’s the nearest town?

Henry Van Statten: Salt Lake City.

The Doctor: Population?

Henry Van Statten: One million.

The Doctor: All dead. If the Dalek gets out it’ll murder every living creature. That’s all it needs.

Henry Van Statten: But why would it do that?

The Doctor: Because it honestly believes they should die. Human beings are different, and anything different is wrong. It’s the ultimate in racial cleansing, and you, Van Statten, you’ve let it loose!

IT’S DALEK O’CLOCK!

First and foremost, I’d like to introduce you to this blog. Yep, that’s right, someone else has joined Red Whine and I on our adventure through space and time and has started reviewing episodes, so if you’d like yet another take on the series, check their blog out. And, of course, head over to Red Whine for his take on this episode.

But, more to the point, let’s take a look at this week’s seminal episode, Dalek. Now, the Daleks have sort of been the bane of my existence since New Who started, and not in the way the show intends them to be. It seems that every time a writer can’t come up with something better or more interesting or maybe even fucking original, they chuck the Daleks at the story, dust off their hands, and walk away. I understand that the Daleks are the most iconic villains in the Whoniverse, and they’re a kind of hazing process that all new Doctors have to go through. But you can’t deny that they’ve been painfully, painfully overused, to the point that I hear those famous tinny voices of doom and roll my eyes, wondering what laboured new “twist” Moffat is going to put on them this time. How many times can the last of the Daleks be destroyed, only for them to return? HOW MANY TIMES, MOFFAT?!

Sure, this gif is from this episode, but I need a hug whenever I think about how painfully the Daleks have been overused. Bleh.

Ahem. But then- then there was this episode. Honestly, it was almost tragic for the show that they seemed to understand instantly that they would never top this episode. It’s probably the best standalone episode of this season, and I can still remember vividly the hype that surrounded it’s broadcast. I remember them on the cover of the Radio Times, I remember my parents insisting that they had to watch it with me “just to see”. This was proper event television, so it was a brave choice to subvert pretty much everything we knew about them over the course of these exquisite forty minutes.

Obviously, the first and most important change is the fact that they can fly, rendering my Dad’s jaw uncharacteristically stiff as it dawned on him that he couldn’t just go up a flight of stairs and render them harmless.

Now with 50% more nightmares!

But, past that, this episode was the first to really delve into what happened in the Time War, as the Doctor ends up face-to-face with a lone Dalek housed in the collection of an American millionaire. It’s here that we find out the Doctor was the only one of his race to survive, and that the Daleks and the Time Lords were wiped out together. As the Dalek points out (with it’s terrifying whisk of death) in their first encounter, the two cowards survived. But for once, the Doctor doesn’t have empathy for this lone survivor, but instead demands that it be killed, and now, no matter what the consequences.

It’s a brave twist to make your leading man the murderous villain (no matter how reasonable his thought process), but Christopher Eccleston- in what is his best performance of the season to date- works in perfect contrast to the Dalek who’s been driven mad by years of torture at the hands of it’s captors. The episode, as well as making the Doctor a bad guy, makes the Dalek a sympathetic character, which is a pretty amazing feat for a tin cylinder with a plunger and whisk sticky-taped to it. There’s a scene towards the start of the episode where the staff who experiment on the collection are trying to get it to talk, but are only able to make it scream. That’s audacious fucking stuff for a teatime TV show, but this episode goes all-out on exploring the cost of war and the impact of survivor’s guilt. As well as, phew, the urge to domesticate the out-of-the-ordinary, the definition of “evil” and how motivation affects that, and how you should NEVER ask a Dalek “what are you going to do, sucker me to death?”, because that’s just asking for trouble.

This guy knows.

So, after Rose (in another fabulous supporting performance where she basically wanders round the collector’s underground bunker flirting with an exceptionally dull supporting Ken doll) accidentally sets the Dalek free, the Doctor is forced to chase it down and stop it killing every last one of the crew. There’s lots of fun action sequences to be had as the Dalek rampages through the bunker, killing everyone in it’s path as Henry Van Statten (the mad collector behind it’s acquisition) insists that it be left intact. The claustrophobic setting is great as the Doctor is forced to watch Rose attempt to flee as the Dalek bears down on her. Eventually, the Doctor and the Dalek have their face-off, and it’s the Doctor- storming into the scene in a maelstrom of fury and frightening presence- who’s the really scary one as the Dalek tries to comprehend something, anything, beyond it’s urge to kill. The ending is genuinely moving, and so good I won’t ruin it here, as it’s proof that Doctor Who can tug at the heartstrings without dipping over into the realm of cheese.

I know there are a lot of quotes in this episode, but it’s supremely well-written and worth quoting, so there.

It’s hard to say much about this episode when I can’t reach through the screen, grab your shoulders, and shake you repeatedly while bellowing “WWWWWAAAATTTTCCCCHHH IIIITTTT” into your face over and over again. I doubt there are many people reading these review who haven’t already seen Doctor Who, but on the off-chance there are: this is your way in. This is where you start. If you want to find an episode that’s packed to brimming with ideas, brilliant performances, and a sharp vein of humour, this is it. There’s no better place to begin than with the most iconic Who villain of all time, and those villains have never been served better than in this episode.

Join us next week as we head off to a space station with Simon Pegg and something questionable in the ceiling.

Who you gonna call (to discuss the new Ghostbusters reboot)?

*hums theme song*

The X-Files Reboot: I Want to Believe (That It’ll be Great)

Doctor Who Recaps, Episode Four & Five: Aliens of London/World War Three

Welcome back to another merry week of Doctor Who-less than a month till the new series! Are you excited? I’m profoundly not, partly because Moffat (I’ll have him yet) has announced that there will be a good number of two-parters in season nine, which would have been great news, oh, about four years ago. Ever since the terrible Living Flesh or whatever episodes from a couple of seasons ago, two-parters in New Who have increasingly seemed more like space-fillers than space adventures (it’s okay, I’ve already killed myself over that attempt at wordplay). Which is a tenuos enough link to get us into our next recap, which covers the first ever two-parter of the rebooted show- Aliens of London, and World War Three (we’re doing double-handers in one review, because these recaps are already stretching out in front of us like that neverending corridor in Time Bandits). And you know what that means, don’t you? We’ll be spending a couple of episodes with the inhabitants of Raxacoricofallapatorius (and yes, I knew that one off the top of my head, or at least you can’t prove otherwise)- better known as the Slitheen. As ever, check out another take on these episodes over at Red Whine.

Look, I know that these episodes are…divisive, at best. Even I can concede that they’re probably the weakest episodes of season one. But Christ almighty, at least when this season was bad, it was still fun (see: the arduously pretentious season 8 shocker Kill the Moon). The Doctor brings Rose back to her own time again, only to find that she’s actually been gone for a year- and as Rose reconciles with her distraught, badass mother, Jackie (who, in this episode, becomes thw first mther to slap the Doctor in the face), and her boyfriend, Mickey, something somewhat surprising happens.

Aliens! Or, at least, alien. In one of the best red herrings I’ve seen before or since, an alien spacecraft carrying a pig-like creature-

Ugh, this thing really freaked the fuck out of me on re-watching. Is that a real pig’s head? Ugh ugh ugh.

-smashes through London. As the authorities hustle to figure out what’s going on, the Doctor deduces that the spaceship was actually launched from earth, and that the creature is just a pig-albeit it one modified with alien technology. UNIT (appearing in the new series for the first time, hurrah!) recruits the Doctor to help them figure out what’s going on, as the mysteriously missing Prime Minister is replaced by an MP who isn’t quite what he seems.

Let’s be clear here: this episode is mainly just a collection of moments that I find amusing. Matt Baker, from my generation of Blue Peter (if you’re not British and you don’t know what that is, this clip should pretty much sum it up for you) appearing briefly baking his “very own edible spaceship” as the Doctor flips through channels, Jackie laying the smackdown on the Doctor for stealing away her daughter, and, of course, the introduction of Harriet Jones (MP Flydale North), one of the most gloriously well-realized supporting characters of Davies’ run.

The actual substance of the episode- farting aliens crammed into human body suits trying to take over parliament- is pretty awful when you actually think about it, but hinges on whether or not you find this-

-on any level intimidating, amusing, or even watchable. I think they’re pretty far from actually scary (I mean, look at those fuckers- they look like some nightmare version of a Baby Born doll), but fuck it, I’m a big fan of using real effects over CGI and I like the fact that for the most part, these things actually exist for the characters to interact with. Some effort went into the design, and even if having them fart away while wearing the skin of their human conquests diminishes their fear-factor somewhat, the show was still finding it’s feet as family viewing and I’m not going to begrudge it some toilet humour. And anyway, Doctor Who has a long and glorious tradition of cramming hapless actors into pretty shit rubber suits in the name of a story, so why should we start getting snobby about it now? Case in point:

If we can consider a show with the green bubblewrap monster a classic, then I’m sorry, but we have no right to be deriding the Slitheen, who are Michael Myers, Golden Freddy, and the notion of death itself rolled into one compared to this.

And I also dig this episode because it’s set on Earth, and we get to spend some more time with Rose’s friends and family. Whenever these episodes roll about with any of the assistants, all it serves to underline is that otherness the Doctor has from the rest of their lives, and how impossible it is to integrate those two things entirely. It’s also nice to see Rose interacting with other humans, for a change, and particularly with Harriet Jones, with their conversations existing apparently only as proof that Moffat cannot write women anywhere near as well as Davies can (seriously, give me five words to describe Clara off the top of your head. No disrespect to Jenna Coleman, who’s great, but Rose actually has, you know, a fully-formed character as opposed to a thousand lines about her short skirts) and to annoy me with the knowledge that we have to deal with Stephen Moffat’s bullcrappery for another two years at least.

But, my non-sequitor ranting aside, I like this episode, despite it’s faults. It’s a good, silly romp that underlines all the things I enjoy about Doctor Who at it’s most silly- an inherent recognition of it’s daftest, the enthusiasm real-life serious people-

(for those not acquainted with him, this is Andrew Marr, a well-respected political journalist and broadcaster, starring in a brief cameo in this episode)

-in getting involved with a story this dumb, and a cast of warm, well-rounded supporting characters joining the Doctor and his assistant in saving the world. And, since there was no room for it anywhere else, I’ll round of the episode by pointing out that this is the second episode is as many weeks to introduce a main cast member of Doctor Who spin-off Torchwood, in the form of Tosh, the doctor who examines the alien pig-man at the start of the first episode (in fact, canonically, she’s a computer expert and is covering for her hungover doctor colleague Owen, but basically what I’m saying is go watch Torchwood because it’s more fun that you think, okay?).

A prize for the best caption for this picture.

Join us next week so I can masturbate furiously over the utter, unparalleled glory of Dalek, the very first episode of New Who to introduce one of the Doctor’s most notorious villains.

Greedy, Lying, or Slutty: Straight-Passing and Bi-Erasure

I was reading an article recently- this article, to be precise- which was centred around the fact that the author believed people who’d only dated members of the opposite sex shouldn’t be allowed to identify as “queer”. And it got me thinking, as things like that often do, about straight-passing and bi-erasure (and the erasure of other, non-mono sexualities, though I’ll be discussing my own experiences specifically).

Look, here’s the low-down: I’ve been in a monogamous relationship with a member of the opposite sex for what feels like a staggeringly long time now. There’s no doubt that the majority of people who glance over my life would assume I was straight, especially if I forgot to wear my “I’M BISEXUAL, ASK ME HOW” badge that day, and I can’t blame them for thinking so. But the fact of the matter is that I am not straight, no matter how much various people would like me to believe I am, and when people describe me as such they’re saying something that doesn’t account for an important part of my sexual and romantic life. But does the privilege I get from passing as straight make up for the fact that I regularly get a big part of my personality ignored? That is the question.

Thing is, I totally understand the urge to keep straight-passing people out of LGBTQ+ spaces. When I see posts declaring that bisexual people with opposite-sex partners shouldn’t be allowed at pride, when I see people rolling their eyes at “fake bisexuals” who they believe are wearing queerness as a status symbol, when I hear people brushing off the right of non-monosexual people to engage with queer culture, I get it. I do. Because queer spaces are, in a lot of ways, one of the few places where hetereonormativity isn’t so, well, normal, and having someone prance in with their opposite-sex partner, looking to all the world like a straight couple and benefiting from all the privileges that brings, seems counter-productive. So I understand where this desire to keep straight-passing bisexuals out of these spaces comes from, and in some ways I find it hard to begrudge anyone that desire, even if the B in LGBTQ stands for “bisexual”, not for “bisexual with the appropriate level of gay for my tastes.”

But then, there’s the problem of bi-erasure. Let’s be clear here: bi-erasure is a thing that exists, both in the media and in real life, where bisexual people are simply seen as monosexual (into one gender) depending on the partner they’re with (or greedy, or lying, or slutty, or…you get it). And by slinking away into a corner and trying not to engage with LGBTQ+ spaces because I’m worried I won’t be seen as queer enough, or I’ll be seen as invading somewhere that isn’t for me, I’m contributing to that, in the same that allowing people to think I’m straight (because it doesn’t always feel appropriate to be all “I LIKE GIRLS THO”. And sometimes, believe it or not, my sexuality isn’t relevant to the interaction I’m having) does the same thing. But then, what’s the alternative?

The alternative is being open and willing to talk about my sexuality with people, which is something I’ve been trying to do over the last few months. I’m not straight, and allowing people to think I am is untrue. But part of the problem there stems from the effect bi-erasure has on society- far more often than you would imagine, people who claim to like and have a modicum of respect for me tell me that bisexuality doesn’t exist, as if that’s something that a) makes even a jot of sense or b) isn’t infuriating as fuck. And then had people defend them for saying that, in a way they would never defend homophobia or transphobia or the like. I’ve had people- otherwise decent, liberal people, mind- call me a liar and a slut.

Or, of course, I have to quantify my bisexuality- how many women have you dated? Have you done x arbitrary sexual act with a woman? Funnily, whenever I was dating a woman, I was never asked to prove my hetreo side, because, you know, of COURSE I must want the dick. Christ, sometimes just mentioning the fact that I’ve dated women or what-have-you in a related conversation is enough to play into the stereotype some people have in their heads of bisexuals performing for attention. Either I say nothing and I’m categorised inaccurately, or say something and immediately fall into a bisexual stereotype in the head of the person I’m telling. I can’t win.

As I’ve said before, I’m never going to argue that my status as a straight-passing bisexual is as difficult or problematic as many other members of the non-hetreosexual, non-cis world (especially as a female bisexual, as my sexuality is often written off as performative lesbianism for the male gaze). But the problem remains: either keep my mouth shut, pass as straight, and contribute to a culture where bisexuals exist only as stereotypes, or open my mouth and potentially back up those stereotypes.

How I Slut-Shamed Your Mother

So, I’ve written before about How I Met Your Mother, because it was one of the first sitcoms I truly loved- sure, it might have paled in comparison to Frasier and Happy Endings and Suburgatory and Frasier (did I mention Frasier?) in recent years, but it’s still my baby and I adore it. I last watched it when the final season was airing in 2014, and I kind of forgot about it after that atrocious ending. A few nights ago, the Consort and I were looking for something to do (besides writing Doctor Who reviews, shameless plug), and we decided to watch a few of our favourite episodes of HIMYM. And both of us came away feeling kind of…urgh. I’d never before realized just quite how fucking grim one of my favourite comedies actually is.

I picked a shot with headless women in the background, because SYMBOLISM.

If you’re in any way acquainted with the show, you’ll know that Neil Patrick Harris, the King of my heart and also of this version of Sugar Daddy from Hedwig and the Angry Inch, plays breakout character Barney Stinson, a hyper-horrible pick up artist who treats women entirely as conquests to be slept with then discarded through any means necessary. Obviously, that’s pretty gross as it is, but generally the audience is encouraged to laugh at his pathetically grim attempts to pick up women, not with him. But then there’s the way he talks about women-hos, sluts, hefties, amongst a variety of other terms, all of which the studio audience howl along with. Guys, guys, look how funny it is that he consistently treats women like shit for engaging in casual sex or not conforming to society’s idealised version of them! And that ends up blurring the line uncomfortably between laughing at his convoluted “plays” to hook up with women, and laughing at the women he takes in with them for being so easy. Equally, there are a couple of episodes where less-than-perfect men are derided for, you know, having a sex drive and wanting to be treated like a normal human being.

If every single tertiary female character didn’t look and act like this, I might feel better about the whole thing.

His character might be a caricature, but the use of these terms isn’t, as evidenced by the fact the rest of the characters regularly describe women like that too. But who can blame them, considering the fact that almost every secondary female character on this show is treated like a dumb slut? They’re consistently stupid, drunk, gullible, vulnerable people, just waiting for our main character to swoop down on them, manipulate them, fuck them, and dump them. Or they’re prudes, torturing our innocent male characters with a lack of sex, (seriously, that plotline turns up an embarrassing amount during the series) which is equally awful. I’ve written before about how sitcom’s compressed time frame often cause sexist/racist/whatever-ist stereotypes, but none have done so as consistently as this. Especially when you compare them to the tertiary male characters, who get actual funny plotlines and don’t have to have their tits out to be shown on camera.

To be fair though, Kyle Machlachlan has a recurring role in the series so I love everything about it and it’s perfect.

But hey, I hear you cry, they have two female lead characters on this show (three if you count the titular Mother in season nine), so they can’t be that bad, can they? Well, yeah, I’m not going to dispute the fact that Robin (played by Cobie Smulders) and Lily (played by Alyson Hannigan) are as well-realized characters as their male counterparts, but they’re regularly shown as part of the Not One of Those Girls trope- they drink, they smoke pot, they enjoy sex, and they’re just as happy to describe women as “bitches” or “sluts” as their male counterparts. It’s okay to deride them, the show seems to tacitly argue, because even though they engage in a lot of the behaviours the derided “hos” do, because they shame other women for doing it, too. There’s something uber-grim about women shaming other women for their behaviour- Christ, it took me months to get rid of the involuntary twitch of disapproval whenever I met a woman who was engaging in behaviours I’d been taught weren’t “ladylike”-but here it’s used to show how cool and down these women are. Ladies, take note: dudes will like you if you call other women dumb sluts!

They’re not like those other girls, because the show often makes jokes of Lily’s high sex drive, or has the men encouraging them to perform lesbianism for them, or other characters calling them sluts for hooking up with people “too soon”. And it’s doubly a shame, because HIMYM has done some awesome stuff with it’s women characters- an infertility plotline was handled fucking beautifully, and the way the show treats their careers as just as valid as the male character’s is heartening. But let’s not forget that one of the biggest plotlines of the series revolves around Barney and Robin, and how he manipulates her by lying to her, dating someone she doesn’t like to make her jealous, and telling her they could never be together, only for her to fall at his feet when he proposes and have it treated as the most romantic thing in the world. For everything good they do with their women characters, they undermine it by holding up manipulation, unwanted persistence, and outright cruel behaviour as something women should look for in a man (and something men should be doing to get women).

Josh Radnor, who plays main character Ted, makes decent riffs on Woody Allen films now. Skip Liberal Arts, go for happythankyoumoreplease.

But when it comes down to it, this is a show that consistently shames women for their sexual behaviour, while it holds up men’s conquests as a victory. And that’s a shame, because it’s a really excellent comedy show- which is not to say that I suddenly don’t find it funny, but, with whole episodes revolving around how Barney has cruelly manipulated women into sex and then discarded them, it’s difficult to laugh along quite as heartily. God-dammit, How I Met Your Mother.

Doctor Who Recaps, Season One, Episode Three: The Unquiet Dead

When this episode first aired, I was straight-up banned from watching it. As a child with a dangerously vivid imagination, driven to weeks of sleepless horror by episodes of Grisly Tales for Gruesome Kids, I totally, in retrospect, understand why my mother didn’t let me watch it when it first came out. At the time, however, I was furious, and vividly remember acquiring the scariest, most lurid details of The Unquiet Dead from my classmates in the playground, piecing together the story and filling in the blanks in my head until it became an untinkably horrible bastion of nightmares far worse than anything the episode actually produces. It wasn’t until a couple of years later that I actually saw the third episode of season one, and even now it holds a special kind of midnight-movie horror to it-I still feel slightly nefarious, like I did reading Goosebumps under my covers by torchlight after I was meant to be in bed, watching this episode that I was so totally banned from seeing at the time.Well, that, and the fact that this is the first bonafide classic episode of New Who.

This episode is one of the best ghost stories Doctor Who ever pulled off, because they’re usually so intent on going “IT’S NOT GHOSTS, BUT A SPACE EXPLORER MOVING IN SLOW MOTION/ALIENS/INSERT MOFFAT-IAN PLOT TWIST HERE” in later episodes. But this episode, revolving around a mysterious series of re-animations taking place in a Welsh funeral home, is just a straight, Dickensian ghost story- which is appropriate, because Mr Dickens himself crops up to join Rose and the Doctor for the first of many a Victorian adventure (Look, they have to get as much wear as they can out of those costumes, alright? That’s why they shot a whole episode on the abandoned BBC Robin Hood set).

Ugh, I’m OBSESSED with Rose’s costume in this episode. Billie Piper is a goddess. Speaking of which, have you been watching her in Penny Dreadful? She’s cracking, and the show is a great high-camp rollick through sexual deviance, Eva Green, re-interpreted literary characters, and Timothy Dalton’s muscular ‘tache.

This episode, for those counting, is the first appearance of Gwen, who would later (well, an ancestor of Gwen’s, whatever, Russel T Davies don’t need no continuity and wanted to wring a bit more from Eva Myles’ contract) take on a lead role in Torchwood, television’s B-movie. And she’s a pleasure in this episode, playing a maid at the funeral home who’s psychic skills are exploited by her employers to find the corpses who’ve wandered off through the city, fulfilling the last engagements they had arranged in life. One of these corpses winds up turning up at a Charles Dickens’ (played by a genuinely brilliant Simon Callow) reading, and Rose gets snatched by the proprietors of the home after she sees too much, and the story launches into a rollicking, scary, good-humoured romp that revealed just how well New Who dealt with it’s history.

I had the serious hots for this version of Dickens back in the day. By which I mean, when I watched this episode two days ago.

As someone with a degree in history (an accidental one, but who’s counting), these episodes are usually my favourite Whoscapades (Stop trying to make Whoscapades happen, Lou). You can take these episodes on purely a surface level and enjoy the zombie-ghost action, but there’s plenty in there for those who happen know a bit more about the time period, with clever and affecting nods to things like Dickens’ tumultuous personal life and his disdain towards the occult. But either way, it’s great fun to see the Doctor turning into a swooning fanboy when he ends up in Dickens’ carriage, trying to remember the name of that scary short story he once read (side note: here’s a really good adaptation of that short story on Youtube, if you’re looking to scare yourself shitless later tonight, because it’s Sunday and that’s what you should be doing). There’s a fun earnestness to this episode, which is written by God-amongst-men Mark Gatiss, which is packed full of excellent puns (“I do love a happy medium”) and sassy Rose quips.

The zombie exhibit is one of the most popular at Cardiff’s Zoo.

This is also the first episode where we meet the truly fallible Doctor. Without giving too much away, he fucks it; despite Rose’s protests, explaining it away as a different morality, he encourages Gwen to sacrifice herself to allow the ghosts into our reality. And it turns out that their motivations were not as pure as he had thought. The Doctor here is desperately trying to fulfill the role of the hero he had been unable to during the Time War, but instead ends up killing an innocent woman in the process in an ending that makes someone other than the Doctor the hero. Things turn out as well as they could, but the Doctor wasn’t the one who made it happen, and that’s an interesting concept to throw into the mix at this early stage of the series. He admits he can’t save Rose, when the two of them are cornered by Welsh zombies (the WORST kind of zombies. Don’t ask me how I know) in a slightly shocking scene that underlines the lack of control the Doctor really has. The episode ends on a melancholy third act, as Dickens leaves the Doctor and Rose, suddenly full of new ideas for his writing and set on reconciling with his estranged family, only for the Doctor to reveal that he dies only weeks later. It’s a bittersweet ending to a lively, fun episode, and one that leaves a very different taste in the mouth that the bad-guys-get-their-due of the first two outings. If you haven’t seen New Who, or believe you have no reason to, this is the place to start to convince yourself- it’s far more than the kid-centric sci-fi ramblings than the show often gets characterised as, especially in it’s earlier seasons, and if you’ve got any fondness for horror, alt-history, or Christopher Eccleston getting compared to a navvie, then this is for you.

CHEEKY SEANCE BANTZ

Join us next week for the first Slitheen two-parter, and my desperate attempts to justify why I’m apparently the only person who doesn’t think it’s utter shite. As ever, enjoy a different take on this episode over at Red Whine.

Hannibal: A Love Letter

Hannibal is love, Hannibal is life. An obituary for one of the best shows on TV.

Best and Worst Trailers from Comic-Con 2015

Nerd-baiting with the Comic-Con 2015 trailers. Suicide Squad looks awful and I’ll hear no different!

Grace and Frankie: Heartfelt Comedy with Teeth

I will never not love Lily Tomlin